On Azrael 13, 1790, a feminist outlet published allegations that a senior Hadit Industries [1] executive maintains a polygamous household of gene-modified women recruited under “voluntary slavery” provisions. The report accuses the firm of normalizing coercion while branding it equality, prompting new calls for oversight and reform.
Hadit Industries, a Nano-Punk leader in gene-engineering and pharmaceuticals, is anchored at Keijō, within the Gaotu Empire [2]. The company projects a public commitment to gender “egalitarianism.” The outlet’s article argues that this promise is undermined by policies and practices that elevate hierarchy over consent. The story centers on an unnamed executive and a circle of women described as “wives” or “domestic staff,” depending on internal documents cited. The report frames the arrangement as performative power. It claims the women’s bodies and labor are integrated into the executive’s status portfolio, rather than honored as autonomous ends.
The veneer of ‘corporate family’ and ‘harmonized phenotype’ in a Hadit Industries penthouse, concealing the mechanisms of “voluntary slavery.” (Credit: Kenomitian)
The outlet traces recruitment to a mechanism widely debated across megacorps: “voluntary slavery.” Under these rules, an adult may contract their person as property, and guardians may contract minors. The arrangement is marketed as choice within hardship. Critics call it a market for desperation. According to the article, the executive’s household illustrates this market’s inner logic. Candidates were presented with life-altering contracts tied to debt relief, residency permits, and medical enhancements. Cosmetic and genetic modifications were positioned as benefits. The outlet says the program’s design blurred the line between advocacy and pressure.
The market for desperation: signing the “voluntary slavery” contract—the life-altering choice between debt relief and permanent personhood transfer (Credit: Kenomitian)
Investigators describe a culture of elaborate consent forms, biometric checkpoints, and behavioral protocols. These routines, they claim, allowed the company to defend the system as lawful and consensual. Dissent, however, was reportedly treated as a compliance anomaly. Career prospects hinged on appearing grateful and flawlessly compliant. The “voluntary slavery” provisions nominally abolish slavery, then reintroduce it via contract. A person may sell their labor and personhood as a “product.” Rights transfer to a purchaser under strict commercial terms. Proponents argue the arrangement preserves choice. Detractors say the market price dictates the choice.
At Hadit, dissent is a “compliance anomaly.” Internal security measures enforce behavioral protocols, where career prospects hinge on appearing grateful (Credit: Kenomitian)
In practice, the outlet alleges, financial precarity sets the stage. Recruiters screen for debt, immigration risk, and family obligations. Contracts anchor control to quantifiable metrics: biometric discipline scores, aesthetic metrics, and fertility schedules. The women are “optimized” to a corporate standard and linked to household prestige. One internal brief, paraphrased by the outlet, describes “family/staff integration pathways.” The document, they say, recommends domestic placement with senior leadership to strengthen loyalty. Training modules cover etiquette, conflict de-escalation, and “aligned intimacy expectations.” The brief treats intimacy as a productivity vector, normalized by policy language.
The outlet claims many candidates were identified among exceptionally gifted women, including those reputed to possess near-maximal magical affinity. They were prized not only for ornament, the article states, but also for charisma, cultural capital, and potential leverage in elite networks. Beauty and enhancement packages reportedly followed. Cosmetic surgery, gene-editing for “harmonized phenotype,” and wearable augmentations were offered. The upgrades were framed as wellness and professional advantage. According to one former contractor, “You learn quickly that the right face is your passport. Refusing means losing your future.”
Prized for near-maximal magical affinity: Hadit Industries uses enhanced women not just for ornament, but as calculated leverage in elite corporate networks (Credit: Kenomitian)
The report contends that technical augmentation also served to standardize behavior. Neurochemical nudges, biofeedback loops, and mood governance protocols allegedly reinforced compliance. The outlet says these interventions were described in materials as “care,” “stability,” and “household cohesion.”
Technical augmentation is branded as “care.” Allegations suggest neurochemical nudges and biofeedback loops are used to reinforce compliance and household cohesion (Credit: Kenomitian)
The article relies on anonymized interviews, partial documents, and two whistleblowers who claim direct knowledge of household management. “It was a showroom,” one source is quoted as saying. “The message was simple: this is success, this is love, this is modern equality. But everything had a barcode.”
A second source describes recruitment scripts: “We asked, ‘What do you want most?’ Then we offered it with conditions. Papers, surgery, safety. They signed because the alternative was hunger, deportation, or losing family.” The outlet says it verified employment histories but withheld identities for safety.
The publication characterizes its own tone as “despondent.” Its editorial argues that despair is rational in a system where the legal definition of a person can collapse into the definition of a product. The piece urges readers to see glamour as a control interface, not an index of well-being.
Hadit Industries declined to answer questions about specific individuals but issued a general statement. “Hadit complies with all laws and therian-rights standards. Our relationships with employees and household affiliates are consensual, transparent, and safeguarded by robust oversight,” the statement reads.
A spokesperson emphasized that the company rejects discrimination. “We are committed to dignity and opportunity for all. Our enhancement programs are voluntary and regulated. Participation carries benefits that participants actively seek.” The spokesperson accused the outlet of bias and “ideological sensationalism.”
Pressed on the “voluntary slavery” contracts, the spokesperson said the firm does not comment on “third-party legal frameworks.” They added, “Where local law offers self-contracting options, participants retain agency. Hadit’s role is to ensure clarity, safety, and fair value.” No additional detail was provided.
At the heart of the dispute is consent. The outlet depicts consent constrained by debt, papers, and status. Hadit depicts consent as documented, modular, and upgrade-rich. The law treats signatures as decisive. Critics counter that signatures measure pressure as much as preference in unequal markets. Scholars interviewed by the outlet call this “manufactured voluntariness.” In their view, the contract sanitizes domination by converting it into purchase. The buyer becomes caretaker and employer. The seller becomes asset and dependent. Power differences widen as the transaction matures.
Sources describe the executive’s domestic setting as a “corporate family.” Public appearances were staged with choreographed roles, matching attire, and synchronized biometric wearables. “It looked like love,” a former service vendor said. “It read like brand.” The outlet reports that social media profiles projected harmony, prosperity, and empowerment slogans. “Ever forward,” a tagline read on one gala invitation. The women’s accounts emphasized gratitude for surgeries, travel, and security. Dissenting posts, the outlet says, disappeared quickly or resurfaced in milder forms.
Behind the scenes, calendars were dense with protocol: medical check-ups, etiquette drills, executive briefings, and donor events. One schedule block listed “aesthetic recalibration,” which a source described as a post-procedure recovery routine. “Miss a session,” they said, “and you risk breach notices.”
Advocates for reform propose three fixes: ban person-as-product clauses, cap enhancement-linked lock-ins, and mandate independent counsel for all domestic placement contracts. They argue that meaningful choice requires options, not only forms. Without options, law becomes choreography for subordination.
The company’s defenders invoke tradition. They present the executive’s household as a voluntary association reflecting conservative values. “A big family is a good society,” one supporter wrote in an internal memo quoted by the outlet. They argue hierarchy can be nurturing when guided by duty. Opponents answer that duty without exit is captivity. In their view, hierarchy may be chosen only when departures are cheap and safe. Enhancement lock-ins, immigration leverage, and private arbitration raise the cost of leaving. The appearance of harmony, they say, becomes a product of fear.
Both sides claim dignity. The conflict shows how dignity can be defined against itself: as obedience to structure or as freedom from it. The law’s current posture, critics argue, leans toward obedience dressed in compliance paperwork.
Why does a private household matter? Analysts point to scale. Senior executives set tone and standards. When the top treats personhood as brand asset, the practice diffuses. Vendors adapt. Recruiters optimize. Compliance manuals codify. What begins as one home becomes a market template. The feminist outlet argues the story is not about sex or scandal, but about governance. Domestic life becomes a policy arena when law transforms people into products. “The home is where the constitution dissolves,” the editorial laments. “Rights don’t vanish. They are repriced.”
Civil groups urge regulatory investigation. They want audits of enhancement contracts, recruitment scripts, and arbitration outcomes. They also want anonymized data on exits: who left, on what terms, and with what medical continuity. Transparency, they argue, is a first remedy. The feminist outlet promises follow-ups and invites further testimony. It frames the story as a referendum on the meaning of consent under market pressure. For the women at the center, the core question lingers: is a choice still a choice when the price of leaving is your future?
Notes extrated from Kenomitian Compendium
[1] Hadit Industries: a Nano Punk megacorporation, prominent in the energy, gene-engineering, pharmaceutical, transportation, agricultural, environmental and mining sectors, as well as in otherworldly exploration and the slave trade. All of its high-level executives flaunt their openly and genetically modified families and staff, and rule over legions of brainwashed artificial lifeforms.
A glympse into the Hadit Industries (Credit: Kenomitian).
[2] Gaotu Empire
A glympse into the Gaotu Empire (Credit: Kenomitian)
